In an article posted by Wear’s War here, John Wear waxes lyrical about the Holocaust denier Roger Dommergue. John takes great pains to tell us…shock, horror that Dommergue is a Jew!
Still makes no difference. The guy is a nutter. Let’s take a look at some of his points.
1. Do we know, in the course of History, of an ethnic group which would not rejoice when learning that, in a war ended fifty years before, it had suffered many less losses than it thought? Would the discoverer of such good piece of news, not be rewarded, celebrated? Would he be overwhelmed with heavy fines, would he escape attempted murder, as such was the case with Professor Faurisson? Do such reactions not belong to a heavy case of psychopathy?
Except that those people whom, according to Mr Dommergue never died, have never actually turned up. Surely he is not of the opinion that Jewish families over the last 70 years would never have actually tried to contact each other?
2. Have the live skeletons which can be seen in such films as “ Night and Fog” (by Alain Resnais), have anything to do with gassing? Are they not the result of famine in the camps because of the systematic bombing of German towns containing more than 100,000 people, “holocausting” hundreds of thousands of women and children who are never mentioned?
Actually, no and no.
The walking skeletons seen at the end of war were due to German overcrowding of concentration camps in Germany and allowing the people there to rot. There were no food shortages outside the camps, allied bombing or not.
The allied bombing offensive has been well documented in many books.
3. Where would have been the 4 million Jews ( if we consider that 2 millions were killed in battlefields), when it is well known that one camp could not contain more than 60,000 thousand people, and that except in Auschwitz, there was no Zyclon- B gas-chambers? ( there never was any proof of mass gasing with any other gas).
More than 2 million Jews were murdered behind the lines by the Einsatzgruppen in Soviet Russia. None were murdered on the battlefield.
4 million Jews were murdered in gas chambers at Auschwitz by Zyklon B and at extermination centres including (but not only) Treblinka, Belzec, Sobibor and Chelmno using Carbon Monoxide gas. Others died in ghettos, from over work and a variety of other causes. The vast majority of those Jews murdered in the gas chambers were cremated.
4. Are the witnesses worth anything, when you know that torture was the way to squeeze out evidence. Such was the case of Commandant Hoess whose ludicrous declaration has become a legend . What about the 100 witnesses of gassing in Dachau, when it is official that there was no gas chamber in that camp?
Most SS eyewitnesses to the gassings and shootings were not tortured. The vast majority of eyewitness testimony was made to German courts in the 1960s. Hoess was tortured by the British on and shortly after his capture. His confession made to them was not used at Nuremberg.
There were very few witnesses to gassings at Dachau. Any gassing that took place there was small scale and experimental in nature. All those sent for gassing were taken out of Dachau and transported to Hartheim.
5. 130 kilos of coal are necessary for the cremation of one dead body. We are told that the Germans cremated 1300 corpses a day. U.S.A aircraft took hundreds of pictures of Auschwitz, during the supposed period of the holocaust. (1943-44). Why is there not a single gigantic heap of the necessary coal? Why not a single black coil of smoke?
Coke was only needed to start the cremation process. The bodies themselves acted as fuel once they were burning.
The USAAF did not take hundreds of photos of Auschwitz. They took relatively few. Gassings of course did not take place every single day. Eyewitnesses at Auschwitz do testify to seeing smoke coming from the crematoria area.
6. Why do radio, films, press, T.V., continue daily to inflict upon us the myth of the six-million-gas-chambers, in a never ending whining and moaning?
a) They don’t.
b) 6 million did not die in gas chambers.
7. Why does the AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK, issue 43, page 666, inform us that in 1941, there were 3.300.000 Jews in occupied Europe?
Because that was indeed the number of Jews under German control up to May 1941. The numbers do not take into account the 5 million Soviet Jews, of which some 2.7 million would come under German control after June 1941, nor the approx 400,000 Hungarian Jews that would be transported west into Poland in 1944.
See here for details.
8. How is it possible that the gas chambers could be just near the crematoria, when any chemist will tell you that Zyclon-B is hyperflammable?
Hydrogen Cyanide is only flammable at very high concentrations; far higher than those used in the gas chambers.
9. Why are revisionist historians persecuted when they demonstrate the hoax of the Shoa? A scientific dialogue, a court ordered appraisal have been demanded since 1980 about a problem specifically arithmetic and technical.
Because Holocaust Denial is viewed quite correctly as a hate crime and is not based on any objective scientific or historical inquiry.
10. How could Zyclon-B gas 1000 people at one time…
Pack 1,000 into a room, seal them in and drop Zyklon B through holes in the ceiling or walls.
Not complicated or costly at all.
11. Why did Leuchter, who was in charge of the maintenance of the USA gas chambers, give the firm evidence that there was no gassing in Auschwitz? Why have Austrian and Polish reports confirmed the Leuchter report? Why is the Rudolf report, which analyses all results, forbidden? Why are those who divulge the Rudolf report, heavily sentenced by the law? And yet the slightest care of the quality and accuracy of the report is not taken.
Leuchter never built of maintained a gas chamber.
Investigations (denier and official) carried out on the Auschwitz gas chambers confirm the presence of Hydrogen cyanide.
The Rudolf Report was to be shown at the Irving Appeal as new evidence. Irving, at the last minute, dropped the report and refused to enter it into his appeal. The Rudolf Report is of course available to buy on the internet. You can also see the report for free.
…and with that I will stop.
My point has been made.
Dommergue: just another a Denier nutter.